91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
It seems a fair while ago, but yes I did drive it back - on about two days MOT I seem to remember lol! Glad to see the car's in good hands and been well cared for. I am driving a Rover 75 CDTi auto Connoisseur Tourer at the mo... And yet miss an XM so when the time comes I might go after the very best auto diesel XM I can find... but one thing worries me; I'll miss the performance. The Rover's had a remap and currently develops around 160bhp with maybe close on 290 lb/ft. I'd consider an XM 2.5 but it's only manual so I'm faced with one choice... 2.1 auto. Something tells me I'll be hankering after some more power before long...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1995 Citroen ZX 1.9D Avantage 3 door, white 106k miles.
Perhaps you can just adjust Phil!
I went from 250bhp/265 ft/lbs Petrol- to the 2.1 Auto XM. And....in my opinion it's about your driving and anticipation. You'll adapt and feel fine about it....
Unfortunately the auto box rather dampens the response of the 2.1, the manual is much livelier and more flexible it will drive most of the day without having to change gear.