Re: Gold 2.0Si'
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 5:01 pm
When I thoroughly rewaxed (4CR cavity wax) our hatchback last year, I removed the wheel arch liners. Was surprised to find a huge slab of soft plastic foam stuffed into the rear wing, behind the rear wheel, and almost filling the space. Presume this was anti-resonance soundproofing. The foam was, thankfully, bone dry, but starting to degrade and disintegrate.
Waxed the complete inner wing space, but decided not to replace/renew the foam, after a bit of thought.
My last experience with factory foam-filled body cavities was on Austin-Morris 1100/1300s, where the sill sections and rear wheel arches were renown for rusting out. I was horrified then to find the rearmost length of the sill, and its hollow continuation into the up-and-over rear wheel arch, were simply stuffed with a length of cheap foam plastic (bathroom sponge quality), so once the water got in there - which it did virtually from Day One - it was guaranteed to stay there!
No doubt a bit of sound deadening of very thin metal on-the-cheap - or else a deliberate attempt to limit the bodywork life.
For the XM, judging the thickness and "quality" of the body panels with the old trick of rapping them with a finger knuckle, does show up the rear wings without the foam to sound a bit less dead as a sheet of metal. This is somewhat mitigated by the new layer of good wax, but I accept something might have been lost in the way of sound insulation/reverberation control. On the road, this isn't noticeable.
The S2 is noted for being better sound insulated than the S1. Wonder whether the rear wing foam is present on S1 as well?
Waxed the complete inner wing space, but decided not to replace/renew the foam, after a bit of thought.
My last experience with factory foam-filled body cavities was on Austin-Morris 1100/1300s, where the sill sections and rear wheel arches were renown for rusting out. I was horrified then to find the rearmost length of the sill, and its hollow continuation into the up-and-over rear wheel arch, were simply stuffed with a length of cheap foam plastic (bathroom sponge quality), so once the water got in there - which it did virtually from Day One - it was guaranteed to stay there!
No doubt a bit of sound deadening of very thin metal on-the-cheap - or else a deliberate attempt to limit the bodywork life.
For the XM, judging the thickness and "quality" of the body panels with the old trick of rapping them with a finger knuckle, does show up the rear wings without the foam to sound a bit less dead as a sheet of metal. This is somewhat mitigated by the new layer of good wax, but I accept something might have been lost in the way of sound insulation/reverberation control. On the road, this isn't noticeable.
The S2 is noted for being better sound insulated than the S1. Wonder whether the rear wing foam is present on S1 as well?

