Re: XM,DS, CX. ??
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:28 pm
They were correct Vince, it is sick
As in not very well, but I think they ment the contrary.
The global resource for Citroen XM owners
https://club-xm.co.uk/Forum/
I wrote that feature. You can also find it in my gallery at carmagazine.co.ukDuke wrote:CX > XM > DS
IMO of course...! I'm not a DS fan - sure I can appreciate how advanced it was for it's time however they don't appeal to me.
There was a design comparison a few years back in a Citroenian that discussed the styling similarities of different Citroens.
Your search - http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Community/ ... r-id=11292casalingua wrote:I wrote that feature. You can also find it in my gallery at carmagazine.co.ukDuke wrote:CX > XM > DS
IMO of course...! I'm not a DS fan - sure I can appreciate how advanced it was for it's time however they don't appeal to me.
There was a design comparison a few years back in a Citroenian that discussed the styling similarities of different Citroens.
Look for it here:http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Community/ ... art-page=7
There's more on the next page.
Compared to most American cars I guess the styling takes a little getting used to and if compared to some hideously outlandish creations that have consumed most of the worlds' supply of chrome I guess it is a bit mild in their eyes...casalingua wrote:The only really odd thing is the writer considers the car to look anonymous. Now that is strange.