Re: Anthracite XM 2.0 SEi Turbo Manual
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:25 pm
Just in case it's any help, I measured some of the pedal sensor voltages too (mine's H2, of course).
Your meter resistance reading of the pedal pot track is about right at 4k5 (within the rough manufacturing tolerances for 4k7 for this sort of device). The safety resistance is actually stated at 2k05 (a very odd value), to 1k7 isn't far off.
My ECU was supplying 4.43v to the pedal pot. With the pedal up, the wiper of the pot is at the ground end of the track (via the safety resistor), so effectively grounded via 2k05. I measured the voltage being fed back to the ECU (pedal up) as actually 0.225v - very nearly zero. Voltage from pot with pedal down was 2.757v. (Voltages read with sensor still connected to the ECU.)
In practice, these top-end and bottom-end (pedal down and pedal up respectively) voltages aren't critical at all. All the ECU is doing is looking for a CHANGE in voltage, and more to the point, actually a RATE OF CHANGE of voltage. Rapid voltage changes mean that the pedal is being used with gusto, i.e. high acceleration, and therefore the suspension needs to go firm, in order to prevent back-end squat. (Similarly, the brake-line pressure sensor/switch is looking for hard braking - which will also move things to firm, to prevent nose dive.)
As I understand it, although several sensors are monitoring the driver/vehicle for non-gentle behavior (acc.pedal, steering, body movement, brake pressure, vehicle speed...) simultaneously, and any one of these can prompt a move to firm (maybe modified by whatever vehicle speed is being detected), the sensors do operate independently. So, I assume, if (for example) the accelerator pedal sensor is bypassed (detached in your case; switchable-out in mine via a grounded 2k2 resistor [=pedal up]) in such a way as NOT to create an electrical problem, then the rest of the system should operate normally.
Your speed sensor problem obviously needs nailing. It's possible that the output from it, via black box, arriving at the ECU isn't clean or tidy (bad connection or whatever), and might need looking at with an oscilloscope. I presume these early sensors can fail/or be marginal: our S2 is on its third one (later type, of course), the first two having given up the ghost when the car was still under warranty! This wiped out not only the speedo reading, but also cruise control and trip computer, all dependent on its output.
Although you could expect the car to behave predictably with the acc.pedal sensor de-mounted (driver's foot might be off the pedal at almost any time), I guess the same couldn't be said for the speed sensor. I'm only guessing, but if the ECU sees, for example, body movement/steering movement at zero speed, it might well go "safe" or get confused!
Keep at it, and keep posting how things go.
Your meter resistance reading of the pedal pot track is about right at 4k5 (within the rough manufacturing tolerances for 4k7 for this sort of device). The safety resistance is actually stated at 2k05 (a very odd value), to 1k7 isn't far off.
My ECU was supplying 4.43v to the pedal pot. With the pedal up, the wiper of the pot is at the ground end of the track (via the safety resistor), so effectively grounded via 2k05. I measured the voltage being fed back to the ECU (pedal up) as actually 0.225v - very nearly zero. Voltage from pot with pedal down was 2.757v. (Voltages read with sensor still connected to the ECU.)
In practice, these top-end and bottom-end (pedal down and pedal up respectively) voltages aren't critical at all. All the ECU is doing is looking for a CHANGE in voltage, and more to the point, actually a RATE OF CHANGE of voltage. Rapid voltage changes mean that the pedal is being used with gusto, i.e. high acceleration, and therefore the suspension needs to go firm, in order to prevent back-end squat. (Similarly, the brake-line pressure sensor/switch is looking for hard braking - which will also move things to firm, to prevent nose dive.)
As I understand it, although several sensors are monitoring the driver/vehicle for non-gentle behavior (acc.pedal, steering, body movement, brake pressure, vehicle speed...) simultaneously, and any one of these can prompt a move to firm (maybe modified by whatever vehicle speed is being detected), the sensors do operate independently. So, I assume, if (for example) the accelerator pedal sensor is bypassed (detached in your case; switchable-out in mine via a grounded 2k2 resistor [=pedal up]) in such a way as NOT to create an electrical problem, then the rest of the system should operate normally.
Your speed sensor problem obviously needs nailing. It's possible that the output from it, via black box, arriving at the ECU isn't clean or tidy (bad connection or whatever), and might need looking at with an oscilloscope. I presume these early sensors can fail/or be marginal: our S2 is on its third one (later type, of course), the first two having given up the ghost when the car was still under warranty! This wiped out not only the speedo reading, but also cruise control and trip computer, all dependent on its output.
Although you could expect the car to behave predictably with the acc.pedal sensor de-mounted (driver's foot might be off the pedal at almost any time), I guess the same couldn't be said for the speed sensor. I'm only guessing, but if the ECU sees, for example, body movement/steering movement at zero speed, it might well go "safe" or get confused!
Keep at it, and keep posting how things go.