Page 5 of 5
Re: Reality distorter required?
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:19 am
by robert_e_smart
Apparently it is in showroom condition.
I dunno, its a lot of money for a XM, but I'd rather spend that kind of money and get a Xm than a lot of the other tat out there that would cost the same.
Re: Reality distorter required?
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:34 am
by Dieselman
robert_e_smart wrote:Apparently it is in showroom condition.
Has he been underneath? It's easy to make a car look good on top.
Mine's the reverse of this, all the dodgy bits are on the visible bodywork, underneath it's the best one I've seen. Not perfect, but I'm working on it.
Re: Reality distorter required?
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:57 am
by robert_e_smart
No idea at all. I hope for his sake that it is as good underneath as it is above. I look forward to seeing a 3.5 K XM in the flesh, and compare its condition to my stock.
My SD is good on top, and less good underneath. It needs a small patch, and a good wax oyling underneath.