Page 4 of 10

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:59 am
by xmexclusive
Hi eduFX

Thank you for posting the photograph record of work on your XM.
The photographs will help many of us in the future.
I was particularly interested in the last photos you posted comparing worn and new strut heads.
There seems to be a design difference with the new strut head.
Do you know the Citroen part numbers for the new strut heads you have?
Did you have to fit different rubber gaiters?

John

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:20 am
by Dieselman
I think the apparent difference is just down to the old one having made a bid for freedom, so the protruding rubber is shorter.

While on that note. Does anyone have some ruined strut tops that could be used to fully investigate remanufacture of new ones? They might need to be completely destroyed to gain accurate measurements.

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:01 am
by eduFX
Hi this are the diferences... ;)

Citroën just sell the new one...

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

eduFX :mrgreen:

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:05 am
by robert_e_smart
Thanks for these pictures Eduardo, very interesting.

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:24 am
by Dieselman
Yes, thanks a lot, they clearly show the construction.

It appears the lower plate and inner cone are bonded together than the cap is fitted and the inner cone then expanded to lock it in place.

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:37 am
by xmexclusive
Hi Dieselman

In the photo I roughly scaled the base rings that hold the gaiter in place.
The new one measures about 15% larger diameter than the old.
I realise that despite being in the same photo the lense may give different magnification but I would like to know if the actual dimensions are different.

John

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:25 pm
by eduFX
xmexclusive wrote:Hi Dieselman

In the photo I roughly scaled the base rings that hold the gaiter in place.
The new one measures about 15% larger diameter than the old.
I realise that despite being in the same photo the lense may give different magnification but I would like to know if the actual dimensions are different.

John
Hi...the serie MK II are more longer...because that the XM MK II have a more rigid suspension :idea: :idea: :idea: :roll:

eduFX :mrgreen:

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:46 pm
by citroenmad
Well i know i like pictures, but even i dont have this many of our cars! :lol:

Very detailed ...

Ill have to leave more time to go through them.

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:41 pm
by eduFX
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

eduFX :mrgreen:

Re: XM 2.0i TCT by eduFX

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:38 pm
by eduFX
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Soft forever... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

http://www.youtube.com/user/edhacvfx

eduFX ;)