The cold starting delay continued so I looked further for possible air leaks into the fuel system.
I checked the air bleed and water drain on the filter unit for tightness and was able to tighten the drain 1/6th of a turn.
WP_20260401_004.jpg
I decided to bypass the fuel heater mounted on the side of the cylinder head, as these are a known leakage point and not necessary since in cold months we use Winter diesel in the Uk, thus the risk of waxing in the filter is much reduced.
I believe the air leakage issue is the O ring that seals the heater unit wears out, but replacing it is a bit of a task as the complete unit has to be removed from the side of the cylinder head, which also means draining and refilling the cooling system.
I cut the hoses and inserted a 10mm copper pipe.
WP_20260401_001.jpg
WP_20260401_003.jpg
I also changed the clip at the pipe to hose joint on over the intake manifold, adding some rubber sheet to ensure the clip was very tight, as these are semi-rigid hoses.
WP_20260401_005.jpg
The cold starting delay now appears to be sorted, with instant starting, no chugging, stalling, or smoke.
Since putting the car on the road I've been unhappy with the ride quality, which was very bumpy and choppy. Initially I was sure the system was stuck in hard mode, but was too busy to put time into it. Over period of weeks it did start to improve and I could tell it was engaging soft mode, but it was still stiffer than it should be...almost as if it was half in soft mode, half in hard mode.
The ride was very brittle and jittery.
I have previously checked for power and Gnd to the Ecu and the electrovalve showing the correct resistance, measured at the loom in the engine bay.
I decided to check the sphere pressures, as when recommissioning the car I put a new pair of IFHS spheres on the front corners and iirc, a new accumulator, the rest I re-gassed back to specification.
As the rear felt stiffer than the front I started there: I ran the car onto ramps, lowered the suspension, but due to the front being so low and the engine bay on this car being very full, couldn't open the pressure bleed on the regulator, so after switching off the engine pumped the brake pedal about 100 times and also moved the height selector several times to call for pressure, then set it back to low.
I expected the rear centre sphere to come off easily after a few thumps with a lump hammer, but it was still tight on, so I used my sphere tool. After loosening it it started to drip fluid and once the pressure was depleted, I unscrewed the sphere.
The rear corner spheres came off easily by gripping and turning with my left hand, while giving it a clout with the hammer.
I tested the part numbers and pressures which were all correct.
This is a Hydractive-1 estate: H1 is known to be stiffer than H2 setup and being an estate it has different rear spheres and pressures to a saloon, to cope with additional loading and the rear ram pistons having 20% larger area.
I referred to the Citroen Private Car books for specifications, which appear to be different to ones from aftermarket suppliers.
For the Citroen information see
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=11023
.
WP_20260403_001.jpg
WP_20260403_008.jpg
As the spheres, not the Hydractive system, provide the ride quality, I checked the damper central orifices were correctly sized.
Larger spheres, with more gas volume/pressure will give a softer spring rate, larger damper orifices will give a softer, less jittery ride, but at the expense of greater roll when cornering.
Through the life of the Xm, Citroen increased gas volume and damper orifice size to give a more compliant ride, which is why H2 equipped Xm have a smoother ride than H1 ones. In addition Series 2 Xm also weigh more.
The electronics simply switches between soft and hard mode and shouldn't directly control ride quality.
I used measured drill bits to check the centre drillings and found them to be on the tight side of their specification, so drilled them. I actually drilled them 0.02mm oversize.
The specification for these particular spheres is:
Front 0.6mm
Rear is 0.7mm
WP_20260403_002.jpg
WP_20260403_009.jpg
I refitted the rear spheres and ran the front of the car onto ramps, lowered the car, opened the regulator bleed and switched off. This should have fully depressurised the hydraulics, including the centre spheres.
Upon unscrewing the front centre sphere I was surprised how much residual pressure there was still locking it on. Again I unscrewed it enough to allow it to drain then removed it.
This made me think the hydraulic shuttle valve must have closed (hard mode) before the main circuit pressure had depleted after unscrewing the pressure relief. As the engine was still running it should have stayed open due to the electrovalve still being powered.
After checking pressure, re-drilling and fitting the spheres I decided to check the electrovalve connection. The electrovalve is mounted behind the front subframe on H1 cars.
There was noticeable corrosion on the connector pins and sockets, which I cleaned with contact cleaner, wire brushed with a mini brass brush, fitted/took apart several times, greased to stop further corrosion and refitted.
The electovalve power feeds are particularly important as they utilise a reduced voltage created by using PWM to reduce the +12v feed. Any connection issues are very likely to cause spurious behaviour, either sticking in hard mode, or a quasi state somewhere between soft/hard modes.
WP_20260403_011.jpg
WP_20260403_012.jpg
Testing the car revealed the ride to be noticeably better and definitely in soft mode unless switched to hard mode.
If I want the ride softer, or less damped, I can adjust the gas pressures, or centre drillings accordingly.