Re: CX vs XM?
Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 12:01 pm
CX was something I missed out on. Went from lots of classic Rovers to BX (work that one out...) and then XM.
Meeting someone who ran a CX was a rare event, but I quickly decided that not only were the cars something rather special, but the owners were too. You didn't buy a CX by accident or default (like Ford or Vauxhall or Austin-Rover), but after a good bit of thought. Owners were discerning and informed, was my impression; they probably also enjoyed a good wine and good food.
Have read a good bit of Setright over the last few months - Bristol Cars & Engines, Drive On! and his last book, Long Lane With Turnings. He had considerable respect for Citroen engineering and innovation . . . and that included XM. James May writes an affectionate postscript in Long Lane, having worked with LJK at Car magazine years before. He recalls some lovely moments: apparently Setright's idea of 'taking exercise' was smoking his usual Sobranie while standing up . . .
Meeting someone who ran a CX was a rare event, but I quickly decided that not only were the cars something rather special, but the owners were too. You didn't buy a CX by accident or default (like Ford or Vauxhall or Austin-Rover), but after a good bit of thought. Owners were discerning and informed, was my impression; they probably also enjoyed a good wine and good food.
Have read a good bit of Setright over the last few months - Bristol Cars & Engines, Drive On! and his last book, Long Lane With Turnings. He had considerable respect for Citroen engineering and innovation . . . and that included XM. James May writes an affectionate postscript in Long Lane, having worked with LJK at Car magazine years before. He recalls some lovely moments: apparently Setright's idea of 'taking exercise' was smoking his usual Sobranie while standing up . . .