Page 2 of 2
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:24 pm
by captainhaddock
It's only an SX Russ, a simple high spec SX.....Not the Very Sexy Model..!:) Anyway, I never noticed the emptiness..after all it says Citroen. And more importantly, it's been quite trouble less the last 18 months, having driven a third of it's total mileage in 15 years or so. Actually that's not true, the other half did most of that:) And it's her fault I now have one for myself!
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:14 pm
by russ92xmsed
Liz has taste!
Well it's one less thing to go wrong, which isn't a bad thing.
On mine that's where the fuel gauge is...well when it wants to be.
Where your fuel gauge is ...on mine it's the temp dial and other side it's the oil level indicator. Got the autobox LCD in there too. Crowded by comparison!
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:07 pm
by XMX
Looks like this one is still available, as it was re-listed on
GUMTREE only yesterday according to the Ad. (£399)
Gumtree Seller wrote:
Make Citroen Model Xm Vsx Turbo
Year 1995
Mileage 209k miles
Seller type Private
Body type 5 Door Hatchback
Fuel type Diesel
Transmission Manual
Colour Black
Engine size 2,068 cc
i have for sale this Citroen in very good condition for the year , the engine and gearbox are in perfect working order , the suspension is going up and down as it should. tax and mot till end of January next year and ready to drive away. the cambelt was changed 25 k ago. please call for drive test on 07557964475. if you see this advert then the car is still for sale
XMX
.
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:18 pm
by CitroJim
That looks lovely and a bargain potentially at the price...
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:53 pm
by russ92xmsed
Looks good, even with that mileage.
Re: 1995 2.1 TD Manual VSX
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:09 pm
by MTXM
When I saw the first photo I though it was my car as the colour and wheels are the same!! Anyway it does now appear to have sold and perhaps to a Forum Member given the earlier remarks?? Regards, Matthew T.