Re: Not a single one
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:44 am
Hi Mike
I did have an estate briefly after my first or second XM - I very soon changed back though! Having said that, they do have the solid feel of the XM and a good ride for springs/torsion bars, they also have good space for a modern estate and are relativly easy to work on. If I couldn't run an XM they would be my second choice. I prefer the 405 to the 406, the latter is to heavy for the 1.9 diesel and is gutless, the 2.1 was available as an option on the 406 and that's the only one to have really, but I think there are more 405s about than 2.1 406s. I would think that we see at least one 405 every day down here, there are three about that I got for friends, the last one a 'P' reg had very comfortable seats and aircon, less than 100k in brilliant condition for very little money. The main disadvantage for me over the XM - apart from the ride, is that the seats are to short.
Peter
I did have an estate briefly after my first or second XM - I very soon changed back though! Having said that, they do have the solid feel of the XM and a good ride for springs/torsion bars, they also have good space for a modern estate and are relativly easy to work on. If I couldn't run an XM they would be my second choice. I prefer the 405 to the 406, the latter is to heavy for the 1.9 diesel and is gutless, the 2.1 was available as an option on the 406 and that's the only one to have really, but I think there are more 405s about than 2.1 406s. I would think that we see at least one 405 every day down here, there are three about that I got for friends, the last one a 'P' reg had very comfortable seats and aircon, less than 100k in brilliant condition for very little money. The main disadvantage for me over the XM - apart from the ride, is that the seats are to short.
Peter