Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Selling off one (or bits :o) of your XM collection, or perhaps searching for those elusive headlight washer covers? This is the place to do it.
User avatar
Dean
Global Moderator
Posts: 6116
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
Location: Isle of wight

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by Dean » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:17 pm

and yes thats the main O/S engine mount, the round ones above are for the torque control mounts (bottom and additional O/S mountings)

D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook

Addicted to Crackanory

XMX
Could do a 2.1 headgasket
Posts: 1171
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by XMX » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:25 pm

boyse7en wrote:Anyone know an online source for replacement rubbers for the top drivers side engine mount on a 2.1SED
Is THIS the one your after ?

XMX
An XM if for life, (Not just for Christmas) !

User avatar
andmcit
XM Guru
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:57 am
Location: South Wales - far, far away too!! :D

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by andmcit » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:28 pm

Cheap at twice the price that one! Not. So, a whole set of mounts found in short thrift on good 'ol ebay.

Andrew

boyse7en
Has changed a sphere or two
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 8:43 am

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by boyse7en » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:42 am

XMX wrote:
boyse7en wrote:Anyone know an online source for replacement rubbers for the top drivers side engine mount on a 2.1SED
Is THIS the one your after ?

XMX

No. Maybe I've been describing it wrong. Where the mount you describe is fitted, there is an arm that goes from the top of that back to the bulkhead which has a rubber at each end (the bulkhead end and the engine mount end)
Maybe it's better described as an engine steady.
1990CitroenXM-engine-small.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1993 Citroen XM 2.1SED Manual Hatch
1999 Alfa Romeo 166 V6
1977 Triumph Stag 3.0 V8
1984 Tiger Cat E1 2.1
1977 Austin Mini 1380cc
2000 Ducati Monster M600
2006 BMW F800S

User avatar
andmcit
XM Guru
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:57 am
Location: South Wales - far, far away too!! :D

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by andmcit » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:39 am

Odd, that looks like a 2.0i petrol motor as opposed to a 2.1TD one? ;)
That would be best described more as a torque bar or engine stabiliser/steady more than a mount.
I've not seen Xm ones listed on online shops or on eBay so it may very well be a dealer only part?
The bushing on similar links can be renewed by pressing in a circular mount like the first eBay links
in this thread and this is can be highly effective - been here with the Cx one.

It'd be well worth checking out for similar fitments on Pug and other Cit models but a log into
Citroën service website will be the only surefire way. I'm not totally sure whether second hand
would be any better than the one you've got on the car considering age/wear etc.

Andrew

Peter.N.
Global Moderator
Posts: 4000
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 am
Location: Charmouth, Dorset

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by Peter.N. » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:09 am

It may be the same as the bottom engine mount, worth checking.
'96 'N' 2.1 td VSX manual estate White RP6695. Sadly gone
2008 C5 2.0. Hdi Estate, Red
2008 C5 2.0. Hdi Estate Silver


Located in Charmouth, Dorset

User avatar
andmcit
XM Guru
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:57 am
Location: South Wales - far, far away too!! :D

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by andmcit » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:12 am

This is more the kind of thing? Though it needs to be the other bush the end shackles are bolted to.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/XANTIA-XM-XSARA-Z ... 0352096635

Peter is quite correct - a diameter/width measurement would help to determine if a bush
can be renewed on the stabiliser.

Andrew

User avatar
Dean
Global Moderator
Posts: 6116
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
Location: Isle of wight

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by Dean » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:14 am

mine used to have that mount but it was rubbish and expensive ish so i took the whole thing out and replaced it with the normal sort of engine mount that you can just buy new bushes for at £10 each.

Image

D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook

Addicted to Crackanory

User avatar
Dean
Global Moderator
Posts: 6116
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
Location: Isle of wight

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by Dean » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:17 am

andmcit wrote:This is more the kind of thing? Though it needs to be the other bush the end shackles are bolted to.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/XANTIA-XM-XSARA-Z ... 0352096635

Peter is quite correct - a diameter/width measurement would help to determine if a bush
can be renewed on the stabiliser.

Andrew
Thats not it Andrew, that is the link bar common to all XU engine mounts the bit thats different on his is the horizontal torque control buffer just undoes and comes out rather than having to press out the bush like in my photo above, do your early 2.0i's not have this setup?

D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook

Addicted to Crackanory

User avatar
andmcit
XM Guru
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:57 am
Location: South Wales - far, far away too!! :D

Re: Wanted: Engine mount rubbers

Post by andmcit » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:29 am

Very likely Dean; problem is, with so many damned varying engines (and cars :roll: ) it all get's
a little samey/blurred about the edges (getting old?) - I'm pleased to say I've not dismembered
a 2.1 or a 2.5 TD (yet) and it's at least 10 years since I pulled apart a 2.0 Xm. Guess it's down to
reliability of the petrol engines I prefer using. :lol: ;)

Now Cx's I won't ever confuse and are a different matter altogether though I've had plenty of
practice with pulling apart Xantiae (1.9TD) in recent years! Did I mention I'm not really a big
fan of diesels?

Andrew

Post Reply